Did Lars Ulrich Sue Napster?

Napster’s first peer-to-peer music network has become a mega-popular way to get music from the internet. But this situation did not suit many major record companies, because it violated copyright.

The locomotive of the legal war against the company was the Metallica group. Rock band drummer Lars Ulrich has taken the lead in a lawsuit against Napster.

The history of Metallica found a special chapter in 2000. At the time, the band, following a decision by drummer Lars Ulrich, sued Napster, a novelty on the Internet that consisted of a file-sharing system between people.

The lawsuit was filed by Metallica after one of the demo recordings of the song “I Disappear”, which was part of the Mission: Impossible 2 soundtrack, was leaked online. The track was hosted by Napster and circulated freely on the Internet.

Metallica won a lawsuit in 2001 forcing Napster to remove any of the band’s music from its file sharing system. The win inspired other artists to file similar lawsuits.

Did Lars Ulrich Sue Napster

Therefore, the Napster brand had to be sold. The service has gone from a P2P exchange program to a sort of forerunner of streaming. The consequences of this case were such that it entered the popular imagination, giving rise to parodies, one of which featured the band’s drummer.

The drummer of the rock band himself notes that Napster representatives used the tactics of playing Metallica against the fans. According to him, this ended up completely changing the origin of the argument: many people thought the band was greedy, although Ulrich maintains that the argument was never motivated by money.

For taking the lead in front of the press, Lars Ulrich has received a lot of negative criticism for his alleged greed in filing a lawsuit against Napster. In addition, although the group won the case in court, other P2P programs became very popular and spawned the heyday of Internet piracy in the early 2000s.

Try it free

Many years later, Lars Ulrich became friends with Sean Parker, one of Napster’s co-founders. And most importantly: the system of online music consumption has acquired a legal character, but this still does not suit the artists.

Several musicians oppose programs such as Spotify, arguing that the remuneration that musicians receive for streaming is very low, as well as the lack of control over the work itself. In the end, the discussion is no different from the timing of the lawsuit filed against Napster.

Initially, the victory was on the side of the industry – Napster servers were closed in 2001. But the association of labels, bands and organizations against Napster was the biggest faux pas in music. Teaming up with Fanning to try to create an alternative – like selling music in digital files like networks like iTunes – would be the smartest option, since Napster’s demise hasn’t affected free song downloads. On the contrary, the circulation of music through the global network without commercial control has only increased.

Metallica themselves have adapted well to streaming, probably because they already have a more open mindset about controlling their work – oddly enough. The group frequently releases exclusive material for digital consumption.

Try it free